<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Shades Of Twilight - Latest Comments in Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4</title><link>http://shades.disqus.com/</link><description>A Singaporean gamer geek's journey into the world of PC games, MMORPGs and gaming hardware</description><atom:link href="https://shades.disqus.com/testing_my_new_ati_4650_on_cod4/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:09:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4</title><link>http://shades.foxtwo.org/2009/03/testing-my-new-ati-4650-on-cod4/#comment-12540425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be lost without ATI 4650. I use ATI 4650 often. I'd be lost without ATI 4650. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">r4 nintendo ds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:09:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4</title><link>http://shades.foxtwo.org/2009/03/testing-my-new-ati-4650-on-cod4/#comment-7593480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;$120 in which currency? If it's US$, it's too expensive for me. I'm on a very TIGHT budget.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides, I just bought this card. There is no way I am buying another card just becos it's "better" less than a year of getting this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FoxTwo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:13:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4</title><link>http://shades.foxtwo.org/2009/03/testing-my-new-ati-4650-on-cod4/#comment-7586108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Get the 4850, it's only $120ish now which is a bargain. It is SIGNIFICANTLY better than the 4650.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4870 &amp;gt; 4850 &amp;gt; 4830 &amp;gt; 3870 &amp;gt; 3850 &amp;gt; 4670 &amp;gt; 4650 &amp;gt; etc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can play Crysis on high at 1280x1024 with the ATI4850, and get about 50fps average. With the 4650, you'll get maybe 10 fps average.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graphics</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4</title><link>http://shades.foxtwo.org/2009/03/testing-my-new-ati-4650-on-cod4/#comment-7586077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeh...a 4830 gets about 60fps on average at your resolution and gfx settings, and a 4850 gets 80-90 average. A 4870 gets over 100 fps on average.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You could've also bought a 4670, only $10 more than a 4650 but 30-40% better performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graphics</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:34:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4</title><link>http://shades.foxtwo.org/2009/03/testing-my-new-ati-4650-on-cod4/#comment-7282689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh why not, since the 4650 is almost like a "value" card now.. for the amount of money, you really get a LOT for it. Note that I haven't even mucked around with overclocking the thing yet - it's still at the default factory setting of 600/400Mhz for GPU and Memory...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FoxTwo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4</title><link>http://shades.foxtwo.org/2009/03/testing-my-new-ati-4650-on-cod4/#comment-7264915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm wavering between buying this 4650 card or paying twice as much for the 4850, for twice the price. I'm thinking the best value would be the 4650. Especially considering I'm taking the leap from the 1600XT. Hah. Almost embarrassed to admit that :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>